Usyk vs. Fury 2: A Controversial Judging Pool Nearly Disrupted the Big Fight

The Role of Teams in Judge Selection In professional boxing, the selection of judges can be as critical as the fighters themselves. For Usyk and Fury, the stakes are incredibly high, and the integrity of the judging process is paramount. Both fighters opted to let their teams handle the details, a common practice in high-stakes matches. This decision, while practical, can sometimes lead to oversights, as was nearly the case with Usyk's team. The Ominous Judge Reports have surfaced indicating that Usyk's handlers almost allowed a judge with a controversial history to officiate the rematch. The Middle Eastern Professional Boxing Commission (MEPB) had initially approved this judge, but concerns were raised about their past decisions and potential biases. It’s crucial to understand how much influence judges can have on the outcome of a fight, especially in a division as competitive as heavyweight boxing. The fact that such a judge could have been in the mix is alarming and underscores the necessity for thorough vetting in the judge selection process. Importance of Transparency and Integrity The near-selection of a dubious judge for the Usyk vs. Fury rematch brings to light the importance of transparency and integrity in boxing. Fans and analysts alike expect fair and unbiased rulings, especially in high-profile matches where millions of dollars and reputations are on the line. The boxing community has long debated the impact of judging decisions on the sport's credibility, and this incident serves as a reminder that vigilance is required to uphold the sport's standards.